<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DPR Affiliate Marketing Blog &#187; Duplicate content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/tag/duplicate-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog</link>
	<description>How I Make Money with Clickbank, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 22:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Automated Blogging: The Rise and Fall and Rise and Fall&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/automated-blogging-the-rise-and-fall-and-rise-and-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/automated-blogging-the-rise-and-fall-and-rise-and-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 21:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/?p=871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Automated blogging has been around for a long time. I remember one of the first tools I used to create content was called Traffic Equalizer. There were probably blogs then but they were nothing like the easy to use content management systems we have today. But that tool worked like a charm to trick Google [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<p><div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Googlelogo.png"><img title="Google Logo officially released on May 2010" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/30/Googlelogo.png/300px-Googlelogo.png" alt="Google Logo officially released on May 2010" width="300" height="103" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Image via Wikipedia</p></div></p>
</div>
<p>Automated blogging has been around for a long time. I remember one of the  first tools I used to create content was called Traffic Equalizer. There were  probably blogs then but they were nothing like the easy to use content  management systems we have today. But that tool worked like a charm to trick  Google into thinking it was a valid niche site. The program created content with  search results based on keywords you entered and because the results naturally  contained a high concentration of the targeted keyword and a good mix of related  one they started ranking really easily and I made a lot of money with Adsense in  those days. It worked for a while and like all systems designed to trick Google,  it started not working as well.</p>
<p>Then along came blogs with feeds that you could ping and rss directories to  pick your links up and spread your auto blog posts even further across the  internet. Blogs could be posted to remotely or you could find scripts or  WordPress plugins to grab content from anything imaginable. Reposting feeds was  an easy process and many auto blogging warriors started with feeds. There are  endless supplies of feeds on the internet. If you found a niche set of keywords  that showed a high cost per click in Adsense, all an aspiring auto blogger had  to do was search for feeds related to his target keywords at one of the many  feed directories and copy and paste those links into his feed posting plugin .  He had just started a brand new business for himself.</p>
<p>But this didn&#8217;t stop at feeds. Google had been warning people for years that  duplicate content would not rank as well, so people simply reposting other blog  posts from feeds were no longer showing up on page one for those high dollar  keywords. Some of these automatic blog guru&#8217;s resorted to building hundreds of  these blogs to make up for the lost income. Some added other content sources  like videos, articles from article directories, plr articles and Yahoo Answer  results. Again, automated content worked for a while and as Google started  filtering out even more duplicate content, article spinners and content  generators were being used more and more often as tools in the automatic  bloggers toolbox.</p>
<p>If  Google was going to stop the rise of more spam content sites in it&#8217;s  results, then those in the automated niche blog business would just use article  spinning software to mix up the words and phrases of one article to create  dozens or hundreds more. These then can be posted all around the internet on  article sites and blogs for even a bigger network of content. After all, search  engines were dumb. They might be able to tell what duplicate content was, but  they had no idea what real English looked like. If the keywords were in the  right place and proximity and the blogger had built enough links, the posts  would rank. You may have run into a few of these posts or articles. They look  alright while you glance over them, every word in English. But if you read the  article, some parts just didn&#8217;t make sense. It was almost as if the previous  slap by Google had opened a whole new horizon to content spammers.</p>
<p>Some spinners working as simply as using Google itself to translate one  article into another language and then translate it back to English. Other  replaced synonyms. Either way, the articles read like ads for Chinese fireworks.  But Google never stops. They eventually adjusted their algorithm multiple times  this year so that is could recognized and unindex spun, unreadable content. Yes,  you now may actually need to know grammar in order to get a better rank in  Google now and your sentences may have to make sense. After all, it is Google&#8217;s  job to present useful content for readers and it&#8217;s not useful if you cannot read  it.</p>
<p>So content is king again but I have no doubt there will be another generation  of automatic content blogs that infects our Google results with spam. It really  will be an endless cycle. Because as soon as Google comes up with algorithms  that read text like a human, the reverse will also be possible, algorithms that  write text like a human. For me, it&#8217;s just not good for my health, trying to  keep ahead of Google. It can give a a person a stroke. I can&#8217;t say I don&#8217;t play  around with <a href="http://www.profit-ware.com/reviews/auto-power-blogs/">automated blogging</a>, but I never trust that anything done the easy  way will last forever. But it is fun, so I will always experiment.</p>
<p>But the best long term plan is unique useful content monetized correctly. You  can write or have it written. And the cost of quality content for the internet  is going up. Which is a two-edged sword for me. I write. It is good to see a new  market for the written word open up that is worth investigating. I would love to  be paid just to write, to tell you the truth. But I also run sites that run on  content and sometimes, I have to say, content I would rather not write. I have  my interests. So to get well-written content, I have to wait for guest posters  who aren&#8217;t spammers or pay well for good content.</p>
<p>Which has me lately looking at options like <a href="http://www.profit-ware.com/reviews/auto-power-blogs/">Auto Power Blogs</a> which gives you  automated blogs and real written content for a monthly price. I just can&#8217;t get  my words around some topics at times. Oh, I can rehash my research but it ends  up flat and lifeless. So open up your blog for guest posting, maybe even pay a  bit to attract better writers. Because content is once a against king and while  not demanding a kings ransom, it is good to see that Google changes benefit real  writers. Unless of course, you study a lot of <a class="zem_slink" title="Natural language generation" rel="wikipedia nofollow" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_language_generation">Natural Language Generation</a> techniques which is beyond the abilities of most people.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2074622/Redefining-Unique-Content">Redefining Unique Content</a> (searchenginewatch.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.organicseoconsultant.com/duplicate-content-who-cares/">Duplicate Content &#8211; Who Cares?</a> (organicseoconsultant.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a rel="nofollow" href="http://layhitters.wordpress.com/2011/05/25/the-google-black-hole-its-hell-and-everyone-is-welcome/">The Google Black Hole &#8211; Its Hell And Everyone Is Welcome</a> (layhitters.wordpress.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_c.png?x-id=cbaf9c9e-804c-4e01-963f-b3663c638683" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/automated-blogging-the-rise-and-fall-and-rise-and-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Create Content &#8211; First in a Series</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/how-to-create-content-first-in-a-series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/how-to-create-content-first-in-a-series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affiliate marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creating content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duplicate content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia How To Create Content Series &#8211; Part I I have fought with content for a long time online. It is hard to come up with content. And writing it is a weird thing. When you are in the groove, you can do a lot. However, one day you stop, and then it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Olin-Warner-LoC-tympanum-Highsmith.jpeg"><img title="Exterior view. Bronze tympanum, by Olin L. War..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Olin-Warner-LoC-tympanum-Highsmith.jpeg/300px-Olin-Warner-LoC-tympanum-Highsmith.jpeg" alt="Exterior view. Bronze tympanum, by Olin L. War..." width="300" height="170" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Olin-Warner-LoC-tympanum-Highsmith.jpeg">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>How To Create Content Series &#8211; Part I</p>
<p>I have fought with content for a long time online. It is hard to come up with content. And writing it is a weird thing. When you are in the groove, you can do a lot. However, one day you stop, and then it is hard to get things started again.</p>
<p>I have tried many tools to help me jumpstart the process but tools aren&#8217; writing. And here are times when writing just does not work. So what other options do you have for content at these times?</p>
<p>One type of content you can use is free reprint articles. The only problem with this plan is that everybody and his brother knows about using freely available articles. Which meansthat the same article that you post to your site or blog could be posted on hundreds of other sites across the internet and search engines don&#8217;t like duplicate content.</p>
<p>If you were a company expected to provide perfect results for millions of searchs a day, would you? Think of it. Why be bombarded with he same article for pages and pages of results? Instead Google and others use an algorithm to determine which of those articles will continue to be in the search engine results and which will just never make it.</p>
<p>So whatever time you saved using a free reprint article is mainly wasted because your chance of getting your article indexed is lowered. So essentially, we are back at square one again, writing your own articles, at least using a free route to content.</p>
<p>The thing about duplicate content is that is taken as a whole. It&#8217;s a percentage. I am not going to give you an exact number but if your article is above a certain percentage different than other similar articles online, then Google let&#8217;s you in and counts your content as unique. The exact percentage is unknown, but I have heard anything from 40% to 60%. And that gives you another, let&#8217;s call it a loophole.</p>
<p>But written content is only one type of content. There are videos, images, audio and various subtypes like PDF&#8217;s, slide shows, etc.</p>
<p>I hope to make this article first in a series of articles on content because links are great and have written a lot about them, but for the most part, once you <a title="learn the concept of link building and social media optimization" href="http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/89-ways-to-promote-your-niche-blog/">learn the concept of link building and social media optimization</a>, you pretty much get it all. However, you have to have something on your site when they get there.</p>
<p>And I am assuming that most of you are an army of one, which makes content hard to come by. Well, let&#8217;s explore that aspect of affiliate marketing, shall we. And by the way, I am not quite sure how many parts there will be in this series. That part I&#8217;m playing by ear.</p>
<h6 class="zemanta-related-title" style="font-size: 1em;">Related articles by Zemanta</h6>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.ronmedlin.com/traffic-generation/seo-google-marketing/tips-of-the-best-seo-strategies/">Tips Of The Best SEO Strategies</a> (ronmedlin.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/021164.html">Daily Search Forum Recap: November 13, 2009</a> (seroundtable.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.mt-soft.com.ar/2009/11/05/how-to-choose-right-professional-seo-company-for-your-website/">How to choose Right Professional SEO Company for your Website?</a> (mt-soft.com.ar)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a title="What content is best?" href="http://become.evolveinternetmarketing.com/entrepreneur_resource/what-content-is-best-%E2%80%93-audio-video-or-text/">What content is best?</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"></li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/e17c6c06-5a90-4076-8d01-e91b74283e0f/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e17c6c06-5a90-4076-8d01-e91b74283e0f" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalproductsreview.net/blog/how-to-create-content-first-in-a-series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

